Monolithic 3D Inc., the Next Generation 3D-IC Company
  • Home
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Papers, Presentations and Patents
    • Overview >
      • Background
      • Why Monolithic 3D?
      • Paths to Monolithic 3D
      • Applications
    • Ion-Cut: The Building Block
    • Monolithic 3D Logic >
      • RCAT
      • HKMG
      • Laser Annealing
      • RCJLT
      • 3D Embedded RAM
      • 3D Gate Array
      • FPGA
      • Ultra Large Integration - Redundancy and Repair
    • Monolithic 3D Memory >
      • 3D DRAM
      • 3D Resistive Memories
      • 3D Flash
    • Monolithic 3D Electro-Optics >
      • 3D Image Sensors
      • 3D Micro-Displays
  • 3D-IC Edge
    • 3D-IC Edge
  • News & Events
    • News & Events
    • S3S15 Game Change 2.0 Video/P
    • Webcast
    • Webinar
    • Press Releases
    • In the News
    • Upcoming Events
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Simulators

Will Trigate play an important role in the Intel-ARM Tussle?

8/1/2011

1 Comment

 
Rivalries between companies have a charm of their own. For many years, it was Intel v. AMD, then it became Microsoft v. Google. The most interesting rivalry today is, of course, Intel v. ARM. After Intel's trigate transistor announcement, I was therefore not surprised to see these news articles:

Picture
eWeek
3-D transistor will indeed help Intel beat back ARM, iHS iSuppli says
xbit Labs
ARM Not Afraid of Intel's 22nm/Tri-Gate Process Technology - Company.
Wired Revolution
Intel’s 3D tri-gate Transistor Redesign Brings Huge Efficiency Gains
+ there were a lot more...


These news articles got me thinking...
  • Intel says their 22nm trigate device gave them 50% lower power or 37% higher performance vs. their 32nm planar device. But how much power did the 22nm trigate device save vs. the 22nm planar device? If ARM has a planar device at 22nm, then that is the important comparison!
  • How much chip power can Intel save by using the 22nm trigate device in a microprocessor (instead of a 22nm planar device)? Interconnects and clocks consume a significant portion of the total power in microprocessors today... so the question is: how much does transistor innovation impact the overall chip?
Let me first share with you the transistor data Intel gave in their press announcement (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2):
Based on Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, you get the data in Fig. 3. You'll notice:
  • With the tri-gate MOSFET, you can get the same MOSFET performance (CV/I delay) at lower operating voltages than a planar MOSFET. Trigate @ 22nm gives ~140mV of supply voltage reduction vs. planar @ 22nm.
  • Transistor dynamic power: Trigate @ 22nm is 50% lower than planar @ 32nm. But when compared to planar @ 22nm, the advantage reduces to 19%.
  • Transistor drive resistance: This quantity is approximately proportional to the ratio of supply voltage and drive current... it improves by 18% by using the trigate @ 22nm vs. the planar @ 22nm. This is an important metric, since it allows one to drive interconnect capacitance faster.
3d ic
How much chip power can one save by using a tri-gate device instead of a planar one?
While Intel's press announcement had detailed transistor data, they did not have much information showing chip power savings possible with the trigate device. This question is important since, like I said above, clock power and interconnect power form a big percentage of chip power today...

I did some calculations to answer this question.
intsim

I used an open-source chip simulator called IntSim for this purpose. IntSim has models that describe various aspects of a modern-day chip, and its results show a good fit to actual data from past Intel microprocessors. Please see Fig. 4 for more details, and also check out the original paper about IntSim at the 2007 Intl. Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD). A GUI-based version of IntSim is available at this link (for free use).
3d ic
For this study, I considered a 1GHz mobile logic core built with (1) 22nm planar MOSFETs, and (2) 22nm trigate MOSFETs. Since Intel presented only relative numbers for transistor performance, I took numbers from the Intl. Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors (ITRS) and scaled them based on the Intel data in Fig. 3. Results of this IntSim study are shown in Fig. 5. I noticed several interesting trends while running these simulations:
  • The 140mV supply voltage reduction enabled by the tri-gate device is very useful, since it saves clock power and interconnect power too (these quantities are proportional to the square of the supply voltage). You'll notice a 28% reduction in clock power and interconnect power in Fig. 5.
  • Transistor drive resistance (Vdd/Ion) reduction provided by the tri-gate device allows it to drive interconnect capacitive loads better. Hence we get smaller size gates for the same performance target. This, coupled with the transistor power benefits shown in Fig. 3, gives a 28% power reduction for logic gates in the design.
  • Repeater power goes down by 32% due to the better transistors. As many of you know, the delay of a long interconnect with repeaters is proportional to Sqrt(RC time constant of wires * RC time constant of transistors). So, better transistors lead to repeated wires with improved performance and power.
Overall... you can get ~28% reduction in logic core power by using a trigate transistor @ the 22nm node instead of a planar transistor @ the 22nm node. This is quite significant. Kudos to Intel's transistor team!

Will Trigate play an important role in the Intel-ARM tussle?
As an engineer, I like the fact that Intel is taking the Finfet into manufacturing - it is a fantastic technical achievement. The Finfet has been shown to work at channel lengths as low as 10nm, and gives neat I-V characteristics. I know some of the original developers of the Finfet @ UC Berkeley as well, and it is always nice to see your colleagues get their innovations into the marketplace.
 
3d ic

But will the Finfet play an important role in the Intel-ARM tussle?
I don't think so. Let me explain why...

There are several variables involved in the Intel-ARM equation:
  • ARM has momentum in the mobile space. I've learned, in my past, that displacing a technology or product entrenched in the marketplace is very very difficult.
  • Intel's x86 architecture is CISC, while ARM's architecture is RISC. RISC architectures have historically given higher performance per watt than CISC in the mobile space. Can x86 bridge this gap? 
Picture
  • Intel chips are one process generation ahead of ARM chips. This is a valuable advantage.
  • ARM chips are typically made in low-cost East-Asian fabs. For example, fabs in Taiwan are known to be 20-50% cheaper than fabs in the US, at the same technology node. This is due to additional government concessions, lower building costs and lower labor costs. All these years, having fabs in the US did not impact Intel, since its only competition was AMD (which had fabs in Europe, which are equally/more costly). But while competing with ARM, low-cost fabs could be important.
  • There are many more suppliers of ARM chips than x86 ones. Customers like more competition, it keeps prices down.
  • Who will be the first to "productize" other breakthrough technologies, such as 3D stacking of DRAM atop logic, and monolithic 3D? Intel or ARM? Some of these technologies could provide more benefits to mobile chip power, performance and die size than trigate.
  • Intel has a lot more resources than players in the ARM world - this could be useful, especially in this day and age when designs cost $100M, fabs cost $7B and process R&D costs $2B.
  • Will Microsoft execute on its goal to get Windows 8 on ARM? How soon and how well will it execute? This is a crucial business issue for laptops and netbooks, but may not impact the smart-phone world much.
Bottom line: The trigate transistor IS a major engineering achievement, but I doubt if it will play a key role in the Intel-ARM tussle. Many of the points mentioned above are more important, I feel.

What do you think will happen in the years to come? Please feel free to share your thoughts and opinions...

- Post by Deepak Sekar
submit to reddit
1 Comment
ajinkya
2/9/2012 01:30:22 pm

Sir Please guide me to simulate the steps of Trigate transistor on IntSim software.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Search Blog


    Meet the Bloggers


    Follow us


    To get email updates subscribe here:


    Recommended Links

    3D IC Community
    3D IC LinkedIn Discussion Group

    Recommended Blogs

    • 3D InCites by Francoise von Trapp
    • EDA360 Insider by Steve Leibson
    • Insights From the Leading Edge by Phil Garrou
    • SemiWiki by Daniel Nenni, Paul Mc Lellan, et al.

    Archives

    March 2022
    December 2021
    August 2021
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011

    Categories

    All
    3d Design And Cad
    3dic
    3d Ic
    3d Nand
    3d Stacking
    3d Technology
    Brian Cronquist
    Dean Stevens
    Deepak Sekar
    Dram
    Education
    Heat Removal And Power Delivery
    Industry News
    Israel Beinglass
    Iulia Morariu
    Iulia Tomut
    Monolithic3d
    Monolithic 3d
    MonolithIC 3D Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Technology
    Moore Law
    Outsourcing
    Paul Lim
    Repair
    Sandisk
    Semiconductor
    Semiconductor Business
    Tsv
    Zeev Wurman
    Zvi Or Bach
    Zvi Or-Bach

    RSS Feed

© Copyright MonolithIC 3D Inc. , the Next-Generation 3D-IC Company, 2012 - All Rights Reserved, Patents Pending