Monolithic 3D Inc., the Next Generation 3D-IC Company
  • Home
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Papers, Presentations and Patents
    • Overview >
      • Background
      • Why Monolithic 3D?
      • Paths to Monolithic 3D
      • Applications
    • Ion-Cut: The Building Block
    • Monolithic 3D Logic >
      • RCAT
      • HKMG
      • Laser Annealing
      • RCJLT
      • 3D Embedded RAM
      • 3D Gate Array
      • FPGA
      • Ultra Large Integration - Redundancy and Repair
    • Monolithic 3D Memory >
      • 3D DRAM
      • 3D Resistive Memories
      • 3D Flash
    • Monolithic 3D Electro-Optics >
      • 3D Image Sensors
      • 3D Micro-Displays
  • 3D-IC Edge
    • 3D-IC Edge
  • News & Events
    • News & Events
    • S3S15 Game Change 2.0 Video/P
    • Webcast
    • Webinar
    • Press Releases
    • In the News
    • Upcoming Events
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Simulators

Three-dimensional FPGAs

4/28/2011

0 Comments

 
Picture

We have a blog post today from  Ze'ev Wurman, the Chief Software Architect of MonolithIC 3D Inc. Ze'ev spent many years leading EDA/software work at Dynachip, eASIC and Amdahl. In today's post, he explores vertical integration in the world of FPGAs.

Rapid escalation of access price to cutting edge technology decimated the number of ASIC designs since 2000, and directed much attention to FPGAs as ASICs replacement. Yet, despite more than a decade of predictions that FPGAs will take over the semiconductor world, this has not happened. In 2000 the FPGA market stood at less than $4B, or about 2% of the total semiconductor market, and last year it was less than $5B or only about 1.5% of the total marker. Clearly, FPGAs did not conquer the (semiconductor) world.The reasons are pretty obvious. Despite their impressive advances in speed and density, FPGAs are still 20 or more times less dense than corresponding ASICs (PDF), 10 times more power hungry, and at least twice slower. Sure, there are exceptions to these for some applications, but overall the picture is not very encouraging. Since much of their disadvantages stem from the area penalty of the programmable interconnect that blows up the die size—and the corresponding power dissipation and delay, efforts have been made to take advantage of three-dimensional stacking to reduce those distance-related penalties.

Tier Logic placed the configuration memory as a second-tier TFT layer. Lin and El Gamal from Stanford explored three-dimensional architectural FPGA variants (PDF) such as in figure 1 and found potential area reduction of up to a factor of 3.2, with concomitant reduction of power and delay by up to 1.7. Le, Reda and Behar from Brown University suggested 3D architectural partitioning across block types (PDF), such as relocating large user memories or DSP blocks to other tiers, and finding smaller potential improvements. Yet the big issue with all these ideas is the fact that nobody knows how to manufacture them: even with state of the art TSVs the vertical connectivity demands are overwhelming, while Tier Logic found that it could not resolve the reliability problems associated with TFT devices.

Recently Xilinx came up with a hybrid solution that placed multiple FPGA dies on a passive silicon interposer that connects among the logic of the FPGA dies (fig. 2). Xilinx claims large power savings by avoiding the need for full-sized off-chip drivers for the short signals on the interposer, yet, at best, this is a half-way measure rather than anything close to a true 3D IC architecture.

Finally, there is a matter of development cost. Coming out every couple of years with a new device family, with the cost to design and tapeout a dozen or more family members, while porting all the IO, PLLs and SerDes to a new technology is not a cheap operation and must cost in the hundreds of millions. Xilinx and Altera have invested years in this process and even they barely have the resources to execute it over and over again with ever-increasing technology costs. Something will have to give.

An effective three-dimensional FPGA solution will address two key issues: it will provide a solution that will take advantage of the third dimension to significantly reduce the average distances between circuits that will result in a large decrease in power dissipation and increase in performance; and it will provide a manufacturing solution so that building these device will be less expensive, and allow the reuse of older-generation analog and quasi-analog elements, which do not need to track the inexorable march of logic technology, such as IOs.

We believe we have a good solution to this problem, which we will present in the near future.

Picture
Figure 1: 3D FPGA, Lin & El Gamal, 2007.

   
   
Picture
submit to reddit
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Search Blog


    Meet the Bloggers


    Follow us


    To get email updates subscribe here:


    Recommended Links

    3D IC Community
    3D IC LinkedIn Discussion Group

    Recommended Blogs

    • 3D InCites by Francoise von Trapp
    • EDA360 Insider by Steve Leibson
    • Insights From the Leading Edge by Phil Garrou
    • SemiWiki by Daniel Nenni, Paul Mc Lellan, et al.

    Archives

    March 2022
    December 2021
    August 2021
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011

    Categories

    All
    3d Design And Cad
    3dic
    3d Ic
    3d Nand
    3d Stacking
    3d Technology
    Brian Cronquist
    Dean Stevens
    Deepak Sekar
    Dram
    Education
    Heat Removal And Power Delivery
    Industry News
    Israel Beinglass
    Iulia Morariu
    Iulia Tomut
    Monolithic3d
    Monolithic 3d
    MonolithIC 3D Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Technology
    Moore Law
    Outsourcing
    Paul Lim
    Repair
    Sandisk
    Semiconductor
    Semiconductor Business
    Tsv
    Zeev Wurman
    Zvi Or Bach
    Zvi Or-Bach

    RSS Feed

© Copyright MonolithIC 3D Inc. , the Next-Generation 3D-IC Company, 2012 - All Rights Reserved, Patents Pending