Monolithic 3D Inc., the Next Generation 3D-IC Company
  • Home
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Papers, Presentations and Patents
    • Overview >
      • Background
      • Why Monolithic 3D?
      • Paths to Monolithic 3D
      • Applications
    • Ion-Cut: The Building Block
    • Monolithic 3D Logic >
      • RCAT
      • HKMG
      • Laser Annealing
      • RCJLT
      • 3D Embedded RAM
      • 3D Gate Array
      • FPGA
      • Ultra Large Integration - Redundancy and Repair
    • Monolithic 3D Memory >
      • 3D DRAM
      • 3D Resistive Memories
      • 3D Flash
    • Monolithic 3D Electro-Optics >
      • 3D Image Sensors
      • 3D Micro-Displays
  • 3D-IC Edge
    • 3D-IC Edge
  • News & Events
    • News & Events
    • S3S15 Game Change 2.0 Video/P
    • Webcast
    • Webinar
    • Press Releases
    • In the News
    • Upcoming Events
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Simulators

Guest contribution: The most expensive SRAM in the world

7/21/2011

3 Comments

 
Picture

We have a guest contribution today from Israel Beinglass, the CTO of MonolithIC 3D Inc. Israel talks about the use of monolithic 3D integration for SRAM stacking above/below logic.

When people are talking about 3D devices, they are most likely referring to TSV.

What is the “killer application” of TSV? Well, it depends on who do you ask. Is it DRAM stacking? Or is it DRAM on top of a Microprocessor, or logic stacking, or FPGA on Silicon - passive interposer (2.5D)? However, as of now, it looks like very few things shown in "3D roadmaps"  have happened.

According to Yuan Xie of Penn. State University who specializes in 3D architecture design, for 3D IC to  be adopted, it has to both enable novel architecture as well as identify a killer application. Things such as latency improvement, better bandwidth, integration and cost benefits are what will make 3D IC happen.

At this point I’d like to make a detour and bring to your attention an even better application for 3D-IC using the monolithic 3D approach. But before that I’d like to ask all of you the following question.

Question: what is the most expensive SRAM in the world?
Answer: Any microprocessor containing SRAM Cache, e.g. Intel’s Penryn 45nm processor or the like (http://www.legitreviews.com/article/480/1/ , see Figures 1 and 2)

Picture
Figure 1: The Intel Penryn Chip

Picture
Figure 2: The benefits of the Penryn microprocessor

By looking at the chip layout, it is clear that half of the area is SRAM cache. So, if you consider the price that the user pays for the chip, the price per unit area of SRAM is unbelievably high!!!             
Figure 3: The "logic" part (left) and the cache part (right)

Now look at these two chip parts shown in Figure 3. What happens If  we put them one on top of the other and interconnect them through “real vias’” and not using the problematic low-density TSV technology - wouldn’t it be wonderful?

Let’s look at the benefits of separating these two chips and using the MonolithIC 3D technology involving layer transfer.

1.    Each chip is much smaller than the original chip size i.e. the yield will be higher on each chip (of course some design modifications need to be done)
2.    The “logic” part could be optimizing as a separate chip and at the same time the SRAM could be optimized by itself.
3.    The number of metal layers is drastically different, in the logic chip 8-10 metal layers are needed while in the SRAM probably no more than 3 layers are needed. Hence, we get a much better utilization of chip production.
4.    The interconnect between the SRAM and the logic part is much shorter along the vertical direction vs. the horizontal (planar) direction.

In summary, this example of a highly SRAM populated chip that could be divided into two chips with a MonolithiIC 3D integration method just makes sense.

submit to reddit
3 Comments
Hsien-Hsin Lee link
7/22/2011 04:06:35 am

The cost should be gauged based on the complexity of design and verification and the fab investment of HKMG @45nm rather than the transistor count. That's also most of the expense being spent on.

Reply
Israel Beinglass link
7/26/2011 04:41:45 am

I agree that the complexity of the design etc. are important but other issues relating to the 3D integration and all benefits from that are important as well.

Reply
george storm
5/23/2012 08:54:49 pm

We are talking microprocesors here - actual manufacturing cost is a relatively small part of selling price.
Look at their cost profile, and (certainly in Intel's case) also at their margins.
That said, if it enables a reduction in memory delay (unproven?) or reduced dissipation this would be invaluable. The other aspect affecting architecture/effectiveness at small geometry is device yield. If 3D can maintain yield at high density this might delay some massive architecture headaches.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Search Blog


    Meet the Bloggers


    Follow us


    To get email updates subscribe here:


    Recommended Links

    3D IC Community
    3D IC LinkedIn Discussion Group

    Recommended Blogs

    • 3D InCites by Francoise von Trapp
    • EDA360 Insider by Steve Leibson
    • Insights From the Leading Edge by Phil Garrou
    • SemiWiki by Daniel Nenni, Paul Mc Lellan, et al.

    Archives

    March 2022
    December 2021
    August 2021
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011

    Categories

    All
    3d Design And Cad
    3dic
    3d Ic
    3d Nand
    3d Stacking
    3d Technology
    Brian Cronquist
    Dean Stevens
    Deepak Sekar
    Dram
    Education
    Heat Removal And Power Delivery
    Industry News
    Israel Beinglass
    Iulia Morariu
    Iulia Tomut
    Monolithic3d
    Monolithic 3d
    MonolithIC 3D Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Technology
    Moore Law
    Outsourcing
    Paul Lim
    Repair
    Sandisk
    Semiconductor
    Semiconductor Business
    Tsv
    Zeev Wurman
    Zvi Or Bach
    Zvi Or-Bach

    RSS Feed

© Copyright MonolithIC 3D Inc. , the Next-Generation 3D-IC Company, 2012 - All Rights Reserved, Patents Pending