Monolithic 3D Inc., the Next Generation 3D-IC Company
  • Home
  • Technology
    • Technology
    • Papers, Presentations and Patents
    • Overview >
      • Background
      • Why Monolithic 3D?
      • Paths to Monolithic 3D
      • Applications
    • Ion-Cut: The Building Block
    • Monolithic 3D Logic >
      • RCAT
      • HKMG
      • Laser Annealing
      • RCJLT
      • 3D Embedded RAM
      • 3D Gate Array
      • FPGA
      • Ultra Large Integration - Redundancy and Repair
    • Monolithic 3D Memory >
      • 3D DRAM
      • 3D Resistive Memories
      • 3D Flash
    • Monolithic 3D Electro-Optics >
      • 3D Image Sensors
      • 3D Micro-Displays
  • 3D-IC Edge
    • 3D-IC Edge
  • News & Events
    • News & Events
    • S3S15 Game Change 2.0 Video/P
    • Webcast
    • Webinar
    • Press Releases
    • In the News
    • Upcoming Events
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • History
    • Team
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
  • Blog
  • Simulators

Do Foundries Have Too Much Power?

12/8/2011

4 Comments

 
Picture

We have a guest contribution today from Israel Beinglass, the CTO of MonolithIC 3D Inc. Israel discusses the foundry industry's history as well as its current landscape...

Today, we are all living in “the foundry world”. Almost all advanced node logic chips are made in foundries (excluding Intel and IBM). Let’s ask ourselves some tough questions regarding these.
  • How did it happen and what can we learn from that?
  • Is there any danger to the world semiconductor production?
  • Do foundries have too much power over their customers?
  • Why does one foundry control over 50% of the advanced logic device manufacturing?
The success of the foundry business model happened into two distinct steps.
1.   The emergence of Fabless companies (e.g. Qualcomm, Broadcom, Altera, Xilinx)
2.   The conversion of IDM companies from IDM to Fab-lite as an intermediate step to fully Fabless companies (e.g. AMD, LSI logic, Motorola, TI-non analog) 

Let’s first review the history of foundries.

Foundry History-Phase one:

Originally the IC industry was practically all IDM (remember in the 80’s through the early 90’s Intel, National, Motorola, AMD, TI, IBM) that designed and manufactured their products. At that time there was a lot of “black magic” and each company developed their unique process and kept it close to their vest, while tweaking the process to optimize the final IC product. However as the time passed and engineers moved between different companies, they brought with them each others' process steps resulted in more standard and unified processes. Also, at the same time, design rules and scaling methodologies became the way of doing business, this allowed to separate design from manufacturing. Of course the introduction of EDA capabilities was instrumental to that development.

Morris Chang, a Texas Instruments executive, was recruited by the Taiwan government to help strengthen its semiconductor industry and became president of Taiwan’s Industrial Technology Research Institute in 1985. He founded the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) in 1987 as the world’s first dedicated IC foundry company. By focusing on manufacturing other companies’ ICs, TSMC met the needs of chip manufacturers requiring outside contractors for overflow and specialty work and provided services for companies lacking the resources to do their own fabrication work. While there was skepticism concerning the viability of such a business model, Dr. Chang was persistent and was able to demonstrate its advantages. TSMC became the template for fabrication houses that followed such as UMC, Chartered, SMIC and Globalfoundries, and through Dr. Chang’s leadership TSMC developed into the largest silicon foundry in the world.

The creation of TSMC sparked the development of fabless IC companies during the 1990s. Dedicated foundries reduced the cost of entry for these companies by manufacturing their chips but without competing with them.

Foundry History-Phase two:

As the foundry business grew and became a winning model, a second phase started in the late ‘90s and early ’00s. The second phase started as the scaling became more aggressive (Moore’s law) and building new Fabs as well as the R&D costs skyrocketed. Most companies couldn’t afford these kinds of expenses. As the results of these many companies closed down their production facilities and moved their manufacturing to foundries. Some examples are LSI Logic, IDT, Motorola (Spun out Freescale), Atmel, AMD (Spun out GlobalFondries). Some of these activities were done in 2 steps. First, the concept of Fab-lite was introduced whereby a company sheds some of the production Fabs and moves to foundry and later on either leave it like that or totally close down manufacturing.

Current Foundry status

Figure 1 shows the overall foundry revenue and the annual growth rate from 2001 through 2011, and estimates for 2012 and 2013 (iSuppli).
Picture
Figure 1: Worldwide Foundry Revenue (Source: iSuppli)
Figure 2 is a table showing 2010 revenue of the top 10 foundries in the world. It is very clear that TSMC is by far the 400lb gorilla in this game with close to 50% market share. The major players are TSMC, UMC, GlobalFoundries and SMIC. The second tier numbers 5-10 are mixed of specialty foundries like TowerJazz, Dongbu and MagnaChip as well as IBM which doesn’t make real efforts to gain market share and Samsung as a newcomer. If we exclude number 5-10 then TSMC has a startling 60% market share!!!!

Advanced technology nodes like 45nm, 32(22)nm and 22(20)nm require massive investment in new facilities, new equipment like steppers and other production tools. During the last few years the foundries did invest vast amount of money in this kind of equipment, this investment will have to continue assuming that they will try to extend the momentum of scaling down to 14nm and beyond.

Picture
Figure 2: Top ten foundries (Source: Gartner).
At this point in time, it looks like TSMC is the overwhelming winner in the foundry business with a whopping 50% market share, an unprecedented situation (comparable maybe only to Intel’s position in the microprocessor arena). Looks like TSMC did everything right from the point of view of technology, customer service, production capabilities etc. At the same time the competitors are behind and it is not easy for them to close the gap.

Some of the questions that come to mind are the following:
  • What about TSMC's customers? Aren’t they worried in case something happens like a massive earthquake, floods or other natural disasters, yield crashes or even political unrest?
  • Another question is the capability of TSMC to raise prices. In some of the advanced nodes they have a big lead over their competitors hence they can charge premium prices.
Some of the big names in Fabless are trying to diversify their production to other foundries but yet the bulk of it stays with TSMC. I don’t have the answer to all these questions but I’m assuming that both TSMC and its competitors are aware of these issues and are looking to address these...

Foundries and advanced packaging;

It has been recently reported that some of the foundries especially TSMC started to work on 2.5D silicon interposers. Looks like the 3D device concept is finally catching up after very long gestation time. 3D TSV is still a long shot since it is still complicated and lacks standardization.

Picture
Figure 3: Logistics of Silicon Interposer Technology.
However the one step before real TSV, the so called 2.5D interposer, is getting some traction. As per this URL the cost at TSMC for a 2.5D is $10K at present!!! Obviously a high price. (http://semimd.com/blog/2011/11/18/foundries-extend-reach-into-packaging-fronts/). Figure 3 shows (as per Amkor) the steps and the supply chain logistics involved with the manufacturing of 2.5D silicon interposers - very complicated.

Looks like the solution that MonolithIC 3D Inc. suggests can level the paying field by un-leveling the IC from 2D to 3D. Reports suggest that every folding is equivalent to one generation of dimensional scaling. Many of the foundries that do not have the volume to justify the enormous investment required for the next generation fab, could instead enhance their existing lines with monolithic 3D technology. By offering 3D options to their customers, they could build devices competitive with the leading edge foundries and leverage well depreciated manufacturing lines. Please tune in to a future blog where I will address some of these issues.

submit to reddit
4 Comments
JG
12/10/2011 07:33:37 am

Completely missed stages -1 and 0 of "how it happened:

-1: US DOD funds electronics research through the Silicon Valley military R&D systems in the 1950s-1970s. Included in this was pre-IC transistor development. Included TTL logic familiars. However, rapid conclusion despite successes: this all can't work if we have to rely on small niche markets (which includes all DOD needs).

0. US DOD through DARPA starts many programs but the two interwoven ones: ArpaNet and MOSIS foundry program. MOSIS is all about the above financial reality and the economic fact that DOD must piggy back on commercial production to maintain state-of-the-art ICs. ArpaNET used MOSIS (along with other programs) as a test bed for implementation of networking systems. The ancestral home of MOSIS is also the home of ArpaNET: USC ISI in Marina del Rey, CA.

Basically what we have today in Foundries is 99% going exactly as planned. Except for the outsourcing bit outside the US which was not expected. Except for that, it's all going to plan.

At this point our current foundry ecosystem is as predictably inevitable as an apple falling from a tree. The cost of fabs has exponentially increased with only wafer size, density and yield edging out that additional cost. This is inevitable based on how things like defects and performance scales. This rise, however, is a key scaling limitation that chocks out small niche applications almost instantly. Only by sharing the load in a portfolio sense is any smallish project economically feasible.

Folks who don't get this either don't want to run the financial numbers or don't know how and substitute ideology for facts.

Reply
E.
12/11/2011 08:02:55 pm

I think JG's comments hit the spot with "The cost of fabs has exponentially increased with only wafer size, density and yield edging out that additional cost."

The difficulties in downscaling and the increasing market demands for integration is drastically reducing the number of competitors. Coming up with a new generation of integrated circuits has become a gigantic task only affordable by big corporations, and that's where we are now. I think it's hardly surprising.

Reply
SiliconGuru
12/12/2011 01:53:59 am

Our world is pretty much controlled & managed by conporate giants where we like it or not(or whether you realize it or not). Why would foundry be any different? Let's come to the sense of reality (reality of the market place not the perceived reality this author is getting)

TSV works well on paper but when it comes to real production you will face all kinds of logistics/operations issues you may not be able to overcome. So at the end, real edge of TSV won't come from TSV itself but how to source the parts you have to build the 3D structure with.

Reply
Israel Beinglass link
12/16/2011 02:28:44 am

Thanks for all the comments, I basically agree wit hall of your comments. My point by writing the blog was that there is a move to have an incredible power to the foundries concentrated in one geographic area. In the case of Intel )of course non foundry) at least they spread their fabs world wide.

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Search Blog


    Meet the Bloggers


    Follow us


    To get email updates subscribe here:


    Recommended Links

    3D IC Community
    3D IC LinkedIn Discussion Group

    Recommended Blogs

    • 3D InCites by Francoise von Trapp
    • EDA360 Insider by Steve Leibson
    • Insights From the Leading Edge by Phil Garrou
    • SemiWiki by Daniel Nenni, Paul Mc Lellan, et al.

    Archives

    March 2022
    December 2021
    August 2021
    August 2018
    July 2018
    May 2018
    October 2017
    September 2017
    December 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    August 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    April 2011
    March 2011

    Categories

    All
    3d Design And Cad
    3dic
    3d Ic
    3d Nand
    3d Stacking
    3d Technology
    Brian Cronquist
    Dean Stevens
    Deepak Sekar
    Dram
    Education
    Heat Removal And Power Delivery
    Industry News
    Israel Beinglass
    Iulia Morariu
    Iulia Tomut
    Monolithic3d
    Monolithic 3d
    MonolithIC 3D Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Inc.
    Monolithic 3d Technology
    Moore Law
    Outsourcing
    Paul Lim
    Repair
    Sandisk
    Semiconductor
    Semiconductor Business
    Tsv
    Zeev Wurman
    Zvi Or Bach
    Zvi Or-Bach

    RSS Feed

© Copyright MonolithIC 3D Inc. , the Next-Generation 3D-IC Company, 2012 - All Rights Reserved, Patents Pending